Have you ever heard a church leader clarify the difference between being a volunteer and being a servant. It is not a subject that came up for me in seminary. I have heard church leaders use the words servants and volunteers as though they are synonymous, but they are not. And the difference between them is the difference between the passionate and the interested.
1. Volunteer is the language of the club
Servant is the language of the church,
Every church has a legitimate club dimension. If someone volunteers to be sure that the doors of the church building are unlocked at a certain time, they are unlikely to do the task with passion. Much of what happens in a church has the same dynamic as any other group who meets regularly. Volunteers take care of many of the necessary, but sometimes mundane, needs of the church. Servants do what they do with passion. Can an usher be a servant? Yes, but it is not likely. In most churches the staff and select few lay people function as servants providing the passion while the rank and file are recruited to do the mundane stuff, which the volunteers do.
2. Volunteers pick and choose where and when they will participate, they are willing.
Servants need to participate, they are compelled.
3. Volunteers operate on some level of compliance.
Servants operates on just one level of commitment
Followers
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Rich
- I am a slave to no man or institution. I have worked with Frank Tillapaugh for thirty years and most of the ideas are work we would like to share.
The next generation
Looking Forward
Popular Posts
-
I have watched new pastors burn out in less than a year...why? Fuller Institute did a survey and found that 80% of pastors believe that past...
-
General Calling and Special Calling Soon after the Roman emperor, Constantine, converted to Christianity in 315 A.D. churches began to profe...
-
I saw one of my friends (Wes, he is a follower of this blog, God bless him) tonight and he told me after reading this blog he was surprised ...
-
If we ask, “what would Jesus do in His new body, i.e. the church; that would be a continuation of what he did in his original body?” The ans...
-
When 20% of the people do 80% of the work in a church, the church leaders usually think that they have an 80% problem. ...
-
I am taking a break from my series to talk about something that just happen. I just met Gavin, he arrived today. His parents Dan and Steph C...
-
And, believe it or not, a strong emphasis on edification does not often generate mission. Mission potential isn't dependent on how well...
-
Several years ago my friend Frank took a walking tour in London that ended up at Wesley’s chapel. As the tour group ap...
-
Nothing influences the environment of a church as much as the preaching. It is through preaching that people understand how their pastor vie...
-
Ok yesterday I had one response to my blog and while it was thoughtful I was reminded that words on a screen do not always convey the experi...
2 comments:
I've heard this explained through the difference between people who serve and people who are servants. One (servant) is by identity, whereas the other (those who serve) is by choice. When it is by choice, we can choose NOT to do it, but when it is by identity, it is in the fiber of who we are so there is no choice involved.
Didn't Jesus refer to himself as a servant first? It follows that we would be most like a church if we followed his example :)
So, what specifically does make the difference between a servant and a volunteer? Me thinks it is the why one does what he/she would ordinarily not do...and whether it is at "church" or at work, the "why" is what matters, no? I wish you would use the name Christ Jesus more often; morons like myself might get your point faster. :)
Post a Comment